Level meter

Resolution is one of the most overlooked specifications when selecting an ultrasonic level meter. Yet, it plays a critical role in determining how precisely the instrument can detect changes in liquid level. In this article, we’ll explain what resolution really means, show practical examples, and help you decide whether 0.1% or 1% resolution is right […]

Introduction Submersible level transmitters, also known as hydrostatic level sensors, are widely used for monitoring liquid levels in tanks, wells, reservoirs, and treatment facilities. Whether applied in clean water, wastewater, oil, or corrosive chemicals, proper maintenance is essential to ensure accurate readings and long-term reliability. In this article, we’ll walk you through key maintenance tips,

1. Introduction In industrial automation and instrumentation control systems, the selection of relay contact types plays a critical role in system reliability and control flexibility. Two commonly used types are: SPST (Single Pole Single Throw) DPDT (Double Pole Double Throw) This article compares the structural differences, wiring diagrams, and application scenarios of SPST and DPDT

Selecting the right level transmitter for small-diameter storage tanks is crucial for accurate liquid level measurement and operational efficiency. With various technologies available, choosing the most suitable option depends on the storage medium, environmental conditions, and required measurement precision. In this article, we will explore the key factors that influence the selection of level transmitters

Anti-condensation ultrasonic level sensors are designed to perform reliably in humid, high-moisture, and high-temperature-difference environments. Their ability to prevent signal disruption caused by condensation makes them ideal for various industrial, agricultural, municipal, and logistics applications. 1. Industrial Process Applications in Humid Conditions ● Food Processing Facilities In processes such as can sterilization, sauce boiling, and

1. Introduction Radar level transmitters have become a preferred solution for level measurement in liquids, slurries, and solids due to their non-contact design, high accuracy, and wide application range. However, in challenging industrial environments—such as high-temperature steam chambers, dusty silos, or foam-prone tanks—various interferences may impact signal stability and measurement accuracy. This article explores the

Pulse Radar, Guided Wave Radar (GWR), and Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Introduction Radar level measurement technologies have evolved significantly over recent decades, offering diverse solutions for liquid and solid level monitoring in industrial environments. This document provides a comprehensive comparison of three mainstream radar level technologies—Pulse Radar (P-Radar), Guided Wave Radar (GWR), and Frequency-Modulated Continuous

Due to their non-contact measurement, high precision, and adaptability to harsh working conditions, radar level transmitters are widely used in various industrial level measurement tasks. This document provides an in-depth discussion on the application and advantages of radar level transmitters in transfer station level measurement. Advantages of Radar Level Transmitters in Transfer Stations: High Precision:

Magnetic level indicators (MLIs) are widely used for liquid level measurement in industrial applications. Proper installation is critical to ensure measurement accuracy, long-term stability, and to minimize maintenance costs. The following key considerations should be observed during installation: 1. Avoid Material Inlet and Outlet Areas Install the magnetic level indicator away from the inlet and

Proper installation is critical to achieving the high accuracy and reliability of radar level meters in chemical industry applications. Incorrect positioning or environmental influences can lead to signal distortion, false readings, and even system failure. This guide outlines key considerations to optimize performance and ensure long-term stability. 1. Avoid Interference from Process and Fluid Dynamics