Single-Flange vs Double-Flange Differential Pressure Level Transmitters: A Comprehensive Comparison - Just Measure it

Single-Flange vs Double-Flange Differential Pressure Level Transmitters: A Comprehensive Comparison

In industrial process control, accurate and reliable level measurement is essential for safety, efficiency, and automation. Among various types of level instruments, single-flange and double-flange differential pressure level transmitters are two commonly used solutions in industries such as petrochemical, pharmaceutical, and power generation.

This article presents a detailed comparison of these two types of transmitters, covering their working principles, structural differences, installation methods, application scenarios, and selection considerations, to help users choose the most suitable instrument for their specific process needs.

1. Working Principle

Level measurement using differential pressure transmitters is based on the principle that a static liquid column exerts a pressure proportional to its height, density, and gravitational acceleration.

  • Static Pressure Formula:

P=ρgh

  • where is the static pressure, is the liquid density, is the gravitational acceleration, and is the liquid height.

  • Single-Flange Type:
    A single-flange transmitter has one pressure-sensing connection (high-pressure side) typically installed at the bottom of the tank or vessel. The low-pressure side is usually vented to the atmosphere or connected via a sealed reference tube. The instrument calculates the level based on the pressure at the sensing point and known liquid density.

  • Double-Flange Type:
    A double-flange transmitter includes both high-pressure and low-pressure connections. The high-pressure flange is mounted at the bottom of the vessel, while the low-pressure flange is installed near the top. The level is determined by the differential pressure between these two points.

2. Structural Features

FeatureSingle-FlangeDouble-Flange
Number of FlangesOne (usually at the bottom)Two (top and bottom)
ComplexitySimpler structureMore complex structure
ConnectionsHigh-pressure side with flange; low-pressure via impulse lineBoth sides connected via remote diaphragms and capillaries
Sealing RequirementsHigh sealing demand for impulse tubingLess sensitive to sealing due to closed capillary system
AccuracyGenerally higherSlightly lower due to potential effects from temperature or capillary elasticity

3. Installation Method

  • Single-Flange Transmitter:
    Installed at a single point (typically tank bottom). The low-pressure side may require impulse piping, which must be properly sealed to avoid measurement errors. Best suited for small to medium tanks.

  • Double-Flange Transmitter:
    Requires installation of both flanges at appropriate elevations on the tank—low and high-pressure ports. Often includes oil-filled capillaries between diaphragm seals and the sensor. Designed for large tanks or harsh environments, where impulse lines are not suitable.

4. Application Scenarios

Application AspectSingle-FlangeDouble-Flange
Container SizeSmall or medium tanksLarge or high-pressure vessels
Pressure/TemperatureModerateHigh-pressure, high-temperature
IndustriesLab-scale equipment, skids, small chemical reactorsRefineries, chemical plants, power generation
Media CharacteristicsClean and stable mediaViscous, corrosive, or hazardous fluids
Maintenance RequirementsMay require frequent calibrationMinimal maintenance, easier replacement

5. Selection Considerations

When choosing between single-flange and double-flange level transmitters, consider the following factors:

  • Measurement Accuracy:
    Single-flange transmitters typically offer higher precision but are more susceptible to errors caused by poor sealing or fluid residue in the impulse lines.

  • Installation Environment:
    Double-flange types are better suited for challenging environments (e.g., high temperature, high pressure, or corrosive atmospheres) due to their fully sealed capillary design.

  • Ease of Maintenance:
    Double-flange systems are generally easier to maintain and calibrate, especially in large installations where access to the measuring point is limited.

  • Cost vs Benefit:
    While double-flange transmitters may have a higher upfront cost, they reduce long-term maintenance and improve stability in complex applications.

6. Conclusion

ScenarioRecommended Type
High-accuracy measurement with clean fluidSingle-Flange
Harsh environment with high temperature or pressureDouble-Flange
Space-constrained or small-scale systemsSingle-Flange
Large industrial tanks or hazardous materialsDouble-Flange

Ultimately, selecting the right level transmitter depends on the specific process requirements, including the type of liquid, tank size, operating conditions, and desired level of precision. Understanding the differences between single-flange and double-flange models helps ensure optimal performance, safety, and cost-effectiveness in your level measurement system.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Contact Us

    Please prove you are human by selecting the heart.
    Translate »