Instrumentation Archives - Page 30 of 79 - Just Measure it

Instrumentation

Universal Troubleshooting Guide for Industrial Instrumentation

1. Purpose & Scope This document provides a structured, methodical approach to diagnosing faults in industrial instruments and control loops. It is intended for maintenance engineers, instrument technicians, and commissioning teams working on transmitters, indicators, recorders, PLC/RTU I/O, and ancillary devices. 2. Safety & ESD Precautions De-energize circuits whenever practical; apply lock-out/tag-out (LOTO). Verify absence […]

Universal Troubleshooting Guide for Industrial Instrumentation Read More »

Accuracy Differences Among Various Level Meters

1. Introduction The accuracy grade of a level meter is one of its most critical performance indicators. It is usually expressed as a percentage relative to the full scale (FS). Due to different measurement principles and application environments, the achievable accuracy varies significantly.This article provides a systematic overview of: General accuracy classification Accuracy characteristics of

Accuracy Differences Among Various Level Meters Read More »

Comparison of HART, BRAIN, and Foundation Fieldbus Protocols for Handheld Communicators

1. Introduction In process automation, handheld communicators are essential tools for configuring, calibrating, and diagnosing smart field instruments. Among the most common communication protocols supported by these devices are HART (Highway Addressable Remote Transducer), BRAIN (Bit Rate Adjustable Intelligent Network), and Foundation Fieldbus (FF).Understanding their differences in communication principles, features, and application scenarios is crucial

Comparison of HART, BRAIN, and Foundation Fieldbus Protocols for Handheld Communicators Read More »

IMA8-EZ02 Paperless Recorder: Features, Wiring, Applications & Best Practices

Abstract The IMA8-EZ02 paperless recorder is a modern data acquisition and visualization platform for process industries. It supports multi-signal inputs (current, voltage, thermocouples, RTDs, resistance, frequency), real-time and historical trending, and secure solid-state storage with USB export. Optional 4–20 mA analog outputs, 24 VDC transmitter power, and serial communications make it easy to integrate with

IMA8-EZ02 Paperless Recorder: Features, Wiring, Applications & Best Practices Read More »

Stainless Steel 316 vs 316L: What’s the Difference?

Executive Summary Main metallurgical difference: 316L has lower carbon (≤0.03%) than 316 (≤0.08%), which reduces sensitization during welding and thermal exposure (≈450–850 °C) and helps prevent intergranular corrosion in the heat-affected zone (HAZ). Strength vs. reliability trade-off: 316 is slightly stronger; 316L offers better weld integrity and cleanliness compliance (sanitary/CIP/SIP). Selection rule of thumb: Welded

Stainless Steel 316 vs 316L: What’s the Difference? Read More »

Calibration and Verification of Hydrogen Gas Humidity Meters

Introduction With the continuous advancement of industrial technology, hydrogen has become an important industrial gas widely used in power generation, chemical processing, electronics manufacturing, and other sectors. In these applications, accurate measurement of hydrogen humidity is essential for ensuring process safety and improving product quality. A hydrogen gas humidity meter is a specialized instrument designed

Calibration and Verification of Hydrogen Gas Humidity Meters Read More »

What’s the Difference Between 304 and 321 Stainless Steel?

Stainless steels are indispensable in various industrial applications due to their corrosion resistance, durability, and strength. Among them, 304 and 321 stainless steel are both part of the austenitic family and often used in similar environments—but they are not interchangeable. This article compares the chemical composition, temperature resistance, mechanical properties, and applications of 304 vs.

What’s the Difference Between 304 and 321 Stainless Steel? Read More »

From Frequent Failures to Long-Term Stability: A Minor Pressure-Tapping Redesign That Solved a Major Issue

1. Background: Persistent Diaphragm Failures in DCS Level Transmitters In a 450,000 tons/year polypropylene (PP) production plant using LyondellBasell’s gas-phase process, frequent failures occurred in level transmitters installed on Reactor #3 during the production of impact-resistant polypropylene. These failures were specific to the DCS-linked level transmitters, which required diaphragm replacement nearly every month, while a

From Frequent Failures to Long-Term Stability: A Minor Pressure-Tapping Redesign That Solved a Major Issue Read More »

Design Considerations for Two-out-of-Three (2oo3) Signal Desynchronization Alarm Logic

1. Introduction In modern industrial automation and process control, redundant sensors are widely deployed to enhance system reliability and safety.For critical measurement parameters—such as temperature, pressure, and liquid level—two-out-of-three voting logic (2oo3) is commonly used. This architecture employs three independent sensors measuring the same variable and determines the valid reading when at least two sensors

Design Considerations for Two-out-of-Three (2oo3) Signal Desynchronization Alarm Logic Read More »

Is Intrinsically Safe the Only Choice for Zone 0 Hazardous Areas?

When working in hazardous areas, selecting the correct explosion-protection method is critical for safety and compliance. Among these, Zone 0 environments—where explosive atmospheres are present continuously or for long periods—are the most demanding. Many engineers automatically think of intrinsically safe (Ex ia) instruments for Zone 0, but is that the only option? The answer is:

Is Intrinsically Safe the Only Choice for Zone 0 Hazardous Areas? Read More »

Translate »