Material Selection Guide for Electrode & Liner in Electromagnetic Flow Meters - Just Measure it

Material Selection Guide for Electrode & Liner in Electromagnetic Flow Meters

Selecting the proper electrode and liner materials is critical to ensure accuracy, reliability, and long service life of electromagnetic flow meters.
Material choices must be made according to fluid properties such as corrosion, abrasiveness, temperature, and pressure.

1. Electrode Material Selection Principles

Electrodes are in direct contact with the process fluid and serve as the signal pickup interface.
Therefore, electrode materials must provide excellent corrosion resistance, sufficient conductivity, and mechanical durability.

1.1 Based on Corrosiveness of the Medium

✔ Neutral water / general utility liquids (pH 5–9)

  • 316L Stainless Steel
    Low cost, good chemical resistance, and widely applicable.

✔ Acidic solutions (HCl, H₂SO₄, HNO₃)

  • Dilute acids (<30%)Hastelloy C

  • Concentrated nitric acid (>65%)Titanium (Ti)

  • Hydrofluoric acid (HF)Tantalum (Ta) or Platinum (Pt)
    Note: HF attacks most metals except Ta; Pt optional for ultra-high purity.

✔ Alkaline solutions (NaOH, NH₄OH)

  • Low concentration alkali316L or Hastelloy B

  • Strong alkali or molten causticNickel (Ni)
    Nickel performs well in caustic media but is not acid resistant.

✔ Chloride-containing media (seawater, NaClO)

  • Avoid 316L (risk of stress corrosion cracking).

  • Prefer Ti or Hastelloy C-276.

1.2 Based on Abrasiveness of Medium

  • Suspended particles, fibers, or slurry
    Tungsten Carbide (WC) or Platinum-Iridium Alloy (Pt-Ir)
    Provides superior hardness and wear resistance compared with conventional metals.

1.3 Special Use Scenarios

  • Food/Pharmaceutical → 316L or Pt, hygienic grade

  • High temperature → choose alloys with 150–200°C capability (Ti, Hastelloy)

2. Liner Material Selection Principles

The liner provides electrical insulation and protects the measuring tube from corrosion and erosion.
Proper selection follows chemical compatibility, temperature rating, abrasion resistance, and sealing performance.

2.1 Based on Chemical Compatibility

✔ Strong acids, strong alkalis, organic chemicals

  • PTFE (Teflon)
    Excellent chemical inertness, pH 0–14, suitable for almost all corrosive fluids.

✔ Weak acids, weak alkalis, saline solutions

  • FEP
    Similar corrosion resistance to PTFE, but more flexible and suitable where vibration exists.

✔ Non-corrosive viscous fluids (oil, syrup, wastewater)

  • CR (Chloroprene Rubber) or NBR (Nitrile Rubber)
    Cost-effective, smooth surfaces with low adhesion tendency.

2.2 Based on Temperature and Pressure

LinerTemperature LimitNotes
CR / NBR-20 ~ 80°CEconomical but aging at high temp
FEP-20 ~ 150°CGood flexibility
PTFE-20 ~ 200°CBest for harsh chemical & high temp
Reinforced PTFE-20 ~ 200°CSuitable for higher pressure (>1.6 MPa)

2.3 Based on Abrasiveness

  • High solids, slurry, mineral process water
    Polyurethane (PU) or reinforced PTFE
    Superior wear resistance compared with standard rubber.

3. Key Considerations and Common Pitfalls

3.1 Material Compatibility

Electrode and liner must support the same fluid condition:

  • HF acid → Ta electrode + PTFE liner

  • High-temperature hot water → Ti electrode + PTFE liner

3.2 Avoid Misapplications

  • Titanium is not a universal choice — avoid in acidic fluoride environments

  • Rubber liners dissolve in organic solvents (fuel, alcohols)

  • 316L is unreliable for chloride-rich seawater

3.3 Cost and Economics

  • Use premium alloys/rare metals only when required

  • Reduce cost for small sizes (DN <50) using FEP + 316L, if compatible

3.4 Installation and Maintenance

  • Rubber liners are prone to mechanical cuts during installation

  • PTFE cracking risk increases with flange misalignment

  • Long shutdowns → drain fluid to prevent chemical soaking and liner swelling

3.5 Verification for Special Fluids

Where compatibility is uncertain:

  • Conduct bench corrosion tests

  • Minimum immersion period: 72 hours on candidate materials

4. Conclusion

Electrode and liner selection for electromagnetic flow meters should always follow a fluid-driven approach:

  1. Evaluate chemical composition

  2. Define temperature & pressure conditions

  3. Consider solids and abrasion

  4. Balance technical suitability and cost

Choosing the correct combination ensures:

  • Long-term stability

  • Accurate measurement

  • Lower maintenance cost

  • Avoidance of premature instrument failure

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Contact Us

    Please prove you are human by selecting the star.
    Translate »