PID Tuning — General Steps & Rules - Just Measure it

PID Tuning — General Steps & Rules

1. Define Control Objectives

Before touching parameters, agree on measurable targets for the loop: setpoint tracking speed, allowable overshoot, steady‑state error, disturbance rejection, and noise sensitivity. Capture hard constraints (actuator limits, safety margins) and the plant’s operating range.

2. Choose Initial Parameters

Pick safe starting values based on prior experience or vendor guidelines. If unknown, start conservative: Kp small, Ki = 0, Kd = 0. Ensure the controller direction (direct/reverse) matches the process.

3. P‑Only Pass

Set Ki = 0, Kd = 0. Increase Kp until the loop responds briskly but remains non‑oscillatory under small setpoint steps and typical disturbances. If sustained oscillation appears, back Kp off by ~20–30%.

4. Add Integral (PI)

Increase Ki gradually to eliminate steady‑state error. Watch for slower decay or emerging oscillations. If the loop starts to hunt, reduce Ki or slightly increase Kp. Use anti‑windup (integrator clamping or back‑calculation) when actuators saturate.

5. Add Derivative (PID)

Introduce Kd to damp overshoot and tame oscillations. Filter the derivative term (e.g., first‑order filter with 1–10% of the dominant time constant) to reduce noise amplification. Avoid excessive Kd which can slow response and amplify measurement noise.

6. Parameter Refinement

Iteratively fine‑tune Kp, Ki, Kd to meet objectives. If available, apply formal methods (e.g., relay test for ultimate gain/period, Ziegler–Nichols, IMC). Validate at multiple operating points and with realistic disturbances.

7. Test & Validate

Run acceptance tests: step changes, load disturbances, and noise scenarios. Verify rise time, settling time, overshoot, IAE/ITAE, control effort, and actuator saturation behavior. Document final settings and known limits.

Quick On‑Site Procedure (5–Step)

  1. Set Ki = 0 and Kd = 0. Increase Kp until just below the onset of sustained oscillation.
  2. Add Ki until the steady‑state error disappears within the target settling time; enable anti‑windup.
  3. Add modest Kd to reduce overshoot and oscillations; apply derivative filtering.
  4. Re‑balance: small increases of Kp after adding Ki and Kd often restore crispness.
  5. Stress test with realistic disturbances and confirm actuator never sticks at limits.

Common Symptoms → Likely Adjustments

Observed Symptom

Likely Cause

Try This First

Slow response / sluggish tracking

Kp too low; Ki too low

Increase Kp; then increase Ki

Large steady‑state error

Insufficient integral action

Increase Ki (with anti‑windup)

Overshoot / ringing

Kp too high; Ki too aggressive

Reduce Kp or Ki; add/increase Kd

Sustained oscillation

Loop near/over ultimate gain

Reduce Kp; reduce Ki; add Kd

Noisy control output

Derivative amplifying noise

Lower Kd; increase D filter; check sensor

Integrator windup (long recovery after saturation)

No anti‑windup

Enable clamping/back‑calculation; reduce Ki

Actuator chattering / excessive control effort

Too aggressive gains or noise

Lower Kp/Kd; add output rate limit or filter

Good setpoint tracking but poor disturbance rejection

Insufficient Kp or Ki

Increase Kp and/or Ki; consider feedforward

Practical Notes

  • Always confirm the actuator and measurement polarity (reverse vs. direct acting).
  • Separate filtering: apply to PV (measurement) and use a modest derivative filter; avoid over‑filtering that adds lag.
  • If process is integrating (e.g., level), start with lower Ki to avoid runaway.
  • For time‑delay dominant plants, target slower closed‑loop bandwidth (don’t chase dead‑time). Consider a Smith predictor if needed.
  • Log trends during tuning; evaluate settling time, overshoot, and control effort rather than relying on a single step test.
  • Record final Kp, Ki, Kd, filter constants, and sampling time in the handover sheet.

Commissioning Checklist

☐ Controller direction verified (reverse/direct).

☐ Actuator limits and rate limits set; anti‑windup enabled.

☐ Initial P‑only test completed; ultimate gain avoided.

☐ Integral added and steady‑state error eliminated.

☐ Derivative added and filtered; noise acceptable.

☐ Performance criteria met across operating range.

☐ Documentation updated and archived.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Contact Us

    Please prove you are human by selecting the heart.
    Translate »